Writing Performance Goals that work

The following examples may help you:

Office Administrator:

Office Administrator: Products and Services

Sales Representative:

Sales Representative: Products and Services

Remember:

Many people with whom the employee interacts are potential customers and may receive occasional outputs (Products, Services or Information). They are important but focus on the key people who receive outputs that are vital for their success or are the main recipients of the outputs that the employee provides.

Identifying the customer helps to ensure that the correct Objectives and Outputs with appropriate weight is allocated to the employee.

Typically, outputs can be derived from the cycle of the job which in simple terms could be described as the following basic process model.

There may be preparation and execution but what is the end result?

Objective should be primarily focused on outputs. An example is that a person who is responsible for chasing money owed to the company would have the output “Outstanding Accounts Paid”

A sales rep may have “Sales Target Achieved”

A Project Manager may have the output “Project Executed”

Notice that we have not said anything yet about how well this should be done. That will come shortly when we look at measures

Performance Outputs

There are normally 5 to 8 outputs but there could be more or less.

The Output can be also expressed as a performance objective e.g.:

Sales Rep: Outputs/Objectives

This is where the detail that supports the output/objectives is described. So, if the output/object was “Achieve Sales Volume, then the KPI’s/Measures will say how much and by when etc.

Output/Objectives and KPIs

In the example under Outputs in the previous section, the Outputs/Objectives are abstracted at a fairly high level. This gives me enough ”space” to articulate my measures. However, I could have decided to set the abstraction at a more detailed level. This would look as per the following:

Sales calls executes and sales revenue achieved

It’s easy to see that these could also be acceptable at a lower level of abstraction. The author of the performance objectives would need to decide at what level to pitch the performance agreement. However, one indication that is useful in this regard is that if you are struggling to determine enough detail for the KPI’s /Measures for a particular an output/objective, then there is a good chance that the output/objective is set at too low a level.


For example, if you decided to make “Missed call made up” as an output/objective, it may be difficult to state “what good looks like” i.e. the measures for this

One of the most frequent mistakes that managers tend to make is that they start to describe the measures in the Output/Objective column. They then also have difficulty determining the measures.

Sales revenue output and objectives
The Aspiration format also has 2 other columns that need to be completed. These are KRA/KPA (Key result area/Key performance area and Balanced Scorecard Link. Firstly, we deal with KRA/KPA. These are normally higher-level categories that only require one or two words e.g.
Sales KRA/KPA
Some companies also use this column to record their strategic objectives. Employees must then align their individual objectives to align to the strategic elements e.g. a company may have a revenue Growth strategy and they can then ensure that people align to this vision

The last element is the Balanced Scorecard element. In the HR world the balanced scorecard is used to ensure that outputs/objectives are not only focused on financial results but the other 3 scorecard elements as well. The balanced scorecard elements are typically the following:

Financial
Internal Processes
Client/Customer Service and relations
Growth and Development (of employees)

However, companies can change this to suit the sector. An airline company that was a client of ours wanted Safety as well, so we added it in.
Sales KRA/KPA
In the Aspiration format the weight is applied to the Output/Objective. It is not applied to KRA/KPA or the KPI’s Measure. The weighting must add up to 100% and the principle is that some objectives are more important and therefore carry a higher weighting.

For example, someone who scores a 4 (out of 5) for a higher weighted Output/Objective and a 2 for a lower weighted Output/Objective, will score higher than someone who scores a 2 for the higher weighted Output and a 4 for the lower weighted Output.

In the Aspiration format there can be a one to many relationships between KRA/KPA and Output/Objective. The weight for the KRA/KPA is derived from the sum of the weightings for the Outputs/Objectives.


So the final format for the Performance (Outputs) Section is as follows:
Sales KRA/KPA

Get in touch

Need more information? We’d love to hear from you!